President Donald Trump’s trade conflict with China escalated this week when Beijing let its currency fall to its lowest level against the dollar in 11 years and suspended its purchases of U.S. farm goods — and the Trump administration promptly branded China a “currency manipulator.” Could a currency war hurt the U.S. economy?

Trump’s response has little immediate practical impact. But together, the new developments raised the dangerous threat of a destabilizing currency war that could infect the global financial system. The stock market responded Monday with its steepest plunge of the year.

Things cooled a bit Tuesday when China appeared to stabilize its currency, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rebounded 311 points. But that was still less than half its loss Monday.

But it could be ramping up again as the yuan edged down on Wednesday to 7.0488 to the U.S. dollar, about 0.4% below its level late Tuesday. The currency strengthened slightly to 7.0443 to the dollar in the afternoon but still was below the previous day’s level.

The People’s Bank of China sets the yuan’s exchange rate each morning and allows it to rise or fall 2% during the day. It can intervene and buy or sell currency — order Chinese commercial banks to do so — to guide the exchange rate.

On Wednesday, the central bank lowered the starting point of the yuan for trading again, setting it at 6.9996 to the dollar, almost 0.5% below Tuesday’s starting level. That would allow the yuan to slide to below 7.1 to the dollar while staying within the trading band.

Officials told companies the slide will stop, “but they haven’t seen that today,” said Chris Weston of Pepperstone in a report. “This is again proving central to moves across markets in Asia.”


It occurs when two countries take steps to lower the value of their currencies to try to gain a competitive edge over each other. A cheaper currency typically makes a nation’s exports more affordable for foreigners — and makes imports more expensive. This action tends to protect a country’s manufacturers, in particular, from foreign competition.


For now, no. The Trump administration has yet to respond to China’s allowing its currency to fall by taking its own steps to lower the dollar’s value to the yuan. Still, this could happen: The option was raised in the White House late last month, according to media reports, and Trump said July 26 that he could take steps to devalue the dollar “in two seconds if I want to.”

And earlier that month, Trump had tweeted that China and Europe were “playing (a) big currency manipulation game” and the U.S. either “should MATCH, or continue being the dummies who sit back and politely watch as other countries continue to play their games.”

Megan Greene, an economist and senior fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, suggested that the Trump administration might decide to lower the dollar’s value to retaliate against China simply because it has few other options. Still, she doesn’t think the move would prove effective, partly because the yuan isn’t widely available on currency markets. It would be hard for the U.S. to buy enough yuan to drive up its value against the dollar.

“It seems like some kind of currency intervention is on the table, just not an effective one,” Greene said.


The Treasury Department maintains what it calls an Exchange Stabilization Fund. It could use this fund to sell dollars and buy yuan, thereby reducing the dollar’s value against the Chinese currency. But the fund contains about $100 billion — not a large sum if your goal is to influence foreign exchange markets, which measure in the trillions of dollars.

And taking such steps would violate the international agreements that the United States has signed not to manipulate the dollar’s value to gain trade advantages.

Trump also wants the Federal Reserve to cut short-term interest rates repeatedly and aggressively. Doing so would make the dollar less valuable for investors to hold.

The Fed cut its benchmark rate last week, and investors expect further reductions in the fall. But on Tuesday, James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, who voted for last week’s rate cut, said the central bank has “done a lot” and argued that it shouldn’t respond to every fluctuation in trade tensions.


Over time, it would be significant. For China, driving the yuan lower would make it harder for its companies to pay off their dollar-denominated debts, because each yuan they earn would translate into fewer dollars. In both countries, cheaper currencies generally raise the price of imports, which could spur inflation. That would also make Chinese imports costlier for American consumers.

“For the U.S. to intervene to try to weaken the dollar would be a terrible mistake,” said Sung Won Sohn, business economist at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.


The most notorious example occurred during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when the U.S. and several European countries sought to devalue their currencies. Jeffrey Bergstrand, a finance professor at Notre Dame and former Fed economist, said that such moves, along with rising tariffs, worsened the depression. After World War II, the U.S., leading European economies, Japan, and others signed onto the Bretton Woods agreement. This accord established a system of fixed exchange rates with the idea of forestalling future currency fights.

Otherwise, the United States has intervened in currency markets only as part of coordinated international efforts to boost the global economy. In September 2000, the United States, along with central banks in Europe and Japan, bought euros to drive the new currency off its record lows.

And in 1985, the G-7 countries agreed to the Plaza Accord. This was a landmark agreement that launched coordinated currency market interventions to sell dollars, which had risen so much in value that it hurt America’s exports.

© The Associated Press. All rights reserved.