You wouldn’t know it from U.S. mainstream media reporting, but on Friday an estimated million Iraqis took to the streets to protest the continued U.S. military presence in their country. What little mainstream media coverage the protest received all reported the number of protesters as far less than actually turned out. The Beltway elites are determined that Americans not know or understand just how much our presence in Iraq is not wanted.

The protesters were largely supporters of nationalist Shi’ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who opposes both U.S. and Iranian presence in Iraq. Protesters held signs demanding that the U.S. military leave Iraq and protest leaders warned of consequences unless the U.S. listen to the Iraqi people.

After President (Donald) Trump’s illegal and foolish assassination of Iranian general Soleimani on Iraqi soil early this month, the Iraqi parliament voted unanimously to cancel the agreement under which the U.S. military remains in Iraq. But when the Iraqi prime minister called up Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to request a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal, Pompeo laughed in his face.

The U.S. government answered the Iraqi parliament’s vote with a statement that the U.S. military is a “force for good” in the Middle East and that because of the continuing fight against ISIS U.S. troops will remain, even where they are not wanted.

How many billions of dollars have we sent to Iraq to help them build their democracy? Yet as soon as a decision of Iraq’s elected parliament goes against Washington’s wishes, the U.S. government is no longer so interested in democracy. Do they think the Iraqis don’t notice this double-dealing?

The pressure for the U.S. to leave Iraq has been building within the country, but the U.S. government and mainstream media is completely — and dangerously — ignoring this sentiment. It’s one thing to push the neocon propaganda that Iraqis and Iranians would be celebrating in the streets after last month’s U.S. assassination of Iranian general Soleimani, who was the chief strategist for the anti-ISIS operation over the past five years. It’s a completely different thing to believe the propaganda, especially as more than a million Iranians mourned the popular military leader.

The Friday protesters demanded that all U.S. bases in Iraq be closed, all security agreements with the U.S. and with U.S. security companies be ended, and a schedule for the exit of all U.S. forces be announced. Sadr announced that the resistance to the U.S. troop presence in Iraq will halt temporarily if an orderly departure is announced and implemented. Otherwise, he said, the resistance to U.S. troops would be activated.

A million Iraqi protesters chanted “no, no to occupation.” The Iraqi parliament voted for us to leave. The Iraqi prime minister asked us to leave. Maj. Gen. Alex Grynkewich, the U.S. deputy commander in Iraq and Syria, said last week that US.. troops in Iraq are more threatened by Shi’ite militias than ISIS.

So, before more U.S. troops die for nothing in Iraq, why don’t we listen to the Iraqi people and just come home? Let the people of the Middle East solve their own problems and let’s solve our problems at home.

Editor’s note: Ron Paul is a noted noninterventionist when it comes to foreign policy but, considering the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad was hit by at least one rocket Sunday evening, does he make a good point that it’s time to withdraw our troops from Iraq? Share your thoughts below.

Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.